In the old days – say, 2 or 3 years ago – you had an internal database of candidate resumes that you mined during a hiring phase. Perhaps you paid a job board to access its resume database. Or perhaps you paid a recruiter, who claimed to have access to resume sources that you couldn’t even imagine. If you were innovative, you might use a tool like AIRS to search across multiple databases (that is, if you had paid for access).


Flash forward to now: last week LinkedIn announced the launch of its Talent Pipeline, a tool that allows recruiters to import resumes, tag them, and link them to the appropriate LinkedIn profiles. It’s designed to manage prospects, not applicants, thus staying out of the ATS zoo – but I can see how it might easily be modified to handle the entire candidate flow. Given that 98% of respondents from my last survey use LinkedIn, this tool seems like a slam-dunk – who wouldn’t want to consolidate what they’re already doing on LinkedIn with the data from their other sources? Oh, did I mention the tool is free for users with the LI corporate recruiting package? Nice upsell, guys!


This release comes on the heels of Monster’s announcement in July of SeeMore, a tool based on Monster’s 6Sense semantic search engine that allows recruiters to comb through internal and external databases of candidates – and the technology is arguably more powerful than LI’s.


Both tools reflect a fundamental change in resume databases that has been brewing for years: tearing down the walls that surround this data. As noted above, recruiters can become overwhelmed with ‘buckets’ of applicant data – and if these buckets exist alongside each other without allowing any type of cross-searching, they lose much of their usefulness. Talent Pipeline and SeeMore represent attempts to tear down the walls between the data buckets (and, of course, these tools provide new revenue opportunities for their respective companies).


I suspect an interesting side effect is that recruiters will be able to see precisely which databases provide the best candidates.


Will we see more tools like these? Undoubtedly. What do they mean for the future of job board resume databases? Hard to say. For those boards with high value, hard to find candidates, there may be little or no effect, as their data will continue to be useful and cost-effective for recruiters. For others with more general and less lucrative candidates, charging for resume access may become a thing of the past.


In either case, this trend is a ‘win’ for recruiters – they can do more with the resumes they have, and spend less time climbing over, around, and under walls.

Views: 143

Tags: Resumes, issues, job, matching, technical


You need to be a member of Job Boarders to add comments!

Join Job Boarders

Agency Acumen

By Cindy Songne, Simply Hired

Recruitment advertising agencies remain a valued partner of many corporate recruiting teams and continue to play a significant role in the development and implementation of their sourcing and recruiting strategy. Cindy Songne, Senior Director Agency Relations at Simply Hired, has served as the liaison between job boards and these agencies for many years. Her biweekly column will explain the role, practices and business model of agencies and the best approaches to developing a sound business relationship with them.

View Blog

Dissecting Big Data

By David Bernstein, eQuest

While metrics and analytics have always played a role in recruitment, it wasn’t until the advent of Big Data that recruiters and employment sites began to consider how best to acquire and exploit the huge volume of data now available.  David Bernstein, Vice President of the Data Analytics Division at eQuest, has been at the forefront in thinking through these issues.  His biweekly column will examine emerging opportunities and best practices for leveraging Big Data to make decisions and take actions that are better informed.

View Blog


© 2014   Created by Peter Weddle.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service